1. An experiment in the economics of production

    An experiment in the economics of production: how can we shift focus from consumption of a finished product to investment in the processes of design, print & production?

    R-Echos issue 1 - AMP001

    This is a poster and a text: an analog R-Echos
    Would you be interested in investing in the tangible production of this work?

    1. You can download the digital archive
    and decide wether or not you’re interested in particpating in this project.
    2. Each participant donate a minimum of £8
    3. The publication is produced
    4. We share the publications
    which means each participant own a fair amount of publications and participants decide (collectively or individually) what to do with it.


    minimum £8



  2. Sometimes, I would like to speak japanese…

    Makin Jan Ma has been kind enough to cite me as one of his friend for an article in the japanese fashion magazine Soen. The magazine’s article is covering his amazing work, and that’s how i ended up part of the creator’s circle in London and depicted à la Tetsuwan Atomu (in english: Astro Boy, in French: Astro le petit robot); I quite like the funny picture.

    soen-magazine.jpg

    If anyone reading Assembling and speaking japanese could put a translation in the comment, it would be lovely :) Thanks! I would love to know what’s written as I felt like a bit on the un-prepared side during the interview…

    The work featured in the magazine is a serie of books: Sun Tzu – KD01k, the Art of War from which we are planning to edit and publish a (very big) research book – more details soon.

    Astro Boy
    Via Wikipedia

    * Electronest is taking care of the interest of Makin Jan Ma online

    ** update: the issue cover is by Eley Kishimoto



  3. A possible future without Net Neutrality

    It sounds pessimistic, i know – but facing reality is sometimes good to draw a better future:

    The internet as we know it is about to die.

    To make it short and simple: net neutrality is the fact that any information transiting on the network is equal to any other. This simple principle ensure people that no information would be considered pre-eminent by any of the internet gatekeeper. You can read a better definition of the Net Neutrality on Wikipedia

    This simple principle is at risk.

    There has been some warning since the early 2000’s – some said it was not relevant, some said it was… but let’s face it: big organisation want to be the gate keeper of the internet – what could possibly stop them from doing discrimination? People reaction, of course. But we can see day after day that such political action is far from reaching its own set goals.

    And what if net neutrality was not going to be the decisive topic of the next us elections (there is a very few chances that this notion of neutrality grab the mind of the average american) – is there really a front here in Europe which could politically oppose such move (and understand it)?
    What would be left to normal people?
    More important: how would we be able to rebuild what would have been destroyed?

    The only alternative I can see today has been suggested last night; there was a meeting of Node London at Gasworks and someone was speaking of the implementation of a wireless alternative to the wired internet as we know it.
    No tips on by who or how this global wireless network would be run – but the suggestion just caught my attention and my imagination for the rest of the meeting and a part of the night.

    netneutrality-31102007(002).jpg

    Here is the picture as I imagine it – this is simply a very basic scenario and is intently thought provoking:
    Wireless technology let us set-up had-hoc network for a very cheap price. More and more machines comes with descent software allowing their user to share documents on a local network – simply put: running an Apache server is a few click away on an OS X machine, for example, and most Windows are coming their IIS server.
    From that point we could perfectly imagine super local network, with content you would provide to your immediate neighbours, and little by little to their neighbours, and theirs, and theirs, and theirs…
    Cities could be connected just by the good will of people – actually not sharing something they are paying for, but sharing a connection to someone else. And also the content could be very handpicked in the sense that it is addressed in a more tangible manner to people they know.

    Of course it sounds quite irrealistic technically at the moment, but…
    How would IP addresses be assigned? Also there would be geographic gaps; it’s easy in a big urban area to imagine such a high density of nodes that it could cover a whole city and why not its suburbs – of course in rural parts it would be harder to connect the dot and make a descent grid.Nonetheless I can remember some experiments in Lausanne, Switzerland were creating network bridge over hills (up and down could be the second name of Lausanne) on quite big distance… I guess there’s not only in Lausanne that people are crossing geographical gaps with wireless network.

    Let’s also consider the experience gained by P2P developer’s in the fields of had-hoc networking; if a few people could get their hands on such a project – it could be a nice alternative to the internet.

    Future is bright and it finally doesn’t have to be Orange.

    The concept is not new and has many echoes in the network history; lots of people have thought on this for quite a long time and Pierre kindly suggested a few links:

    Wireless Mesh Network which examines more precisely the feasibility of such had-hoc network on a large scale.

    Net Equality is an organisation in the US which aim is to provide ‘free internet access for low-income communities. We provide planning, deployment resources and internet mesh products worldwide and install free network hardware in qualified communities in the Pacific Northwest.

    It’s also the topic of a novel by C. Doctorow, “Someone Comes to Town, Someone leaves Town” -you can download it from: http://craphound.com/someone/download.php



  4. mass media unit (memory)

    MMD contains a screen, loudspeaker, stroboscope, 2 gaz bottles (one filled with N2O, the other with oxygen) The differents parts of the MMD are activated by the presence and the frequency of words Each word is displayed on the screen during a very short time (eye memory, flicking effect), a sound marks each second creating the base rythm, another sound is played for each displayed word. the stroboscope is activated depending on certain words. the gaz will be diffused more or less fast inside the helmet The MMD has also a camera which will display on an external monitor the head of the user, and 4 tiltswitch giving the user the ability to go faster or slower. After a certain period of time, the MMD will stop itself.